Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Reasons why Jay Clayton for SEC is bad; and a Delaware law firm is doomed to close

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Travel from OK, to DE, NY, CA
    Posts
    1,516

    Reasons why Jay Clayton for SEC is bad; and a Delaware law firm is doomed to close

    As my letter to Trump ( http://tinyurl.com/jdghe53 ) after my letter to 8 SDNY Judges ( http://tinyurl.com/hapkyge ) , and notifcations to others (including a letter daring the USAG to arrest me, if any of my allegations were false, stated, Goldman Sachs and Bain Capital are partners in crime, against our eToys public company.

    GSachs & Bain Cap., deliberately destroyed our eToys via their bad faith counsels who LIED UNDER OATH (Paul Traub confessed deliberately doing so).

    (see Wall Street Journal July 2005
    http://www.post-gazette.com/business...s/200507250210 )

    Goldman Sachs took eToys public doing hundreds of millions of dollars in a pump-n-dump stock fraud "spinning" scheme.
    (see NY Times March 2013
    https://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/03/1...-ipo-game.html )

    Goldman Sachs Delaware law firm LIED UNDER OATH in the eToys bankruptcy case, hiding the fact it was Goldman Sachs law firm, to become eToys Debtor counsel ..AND THIS IS NOW CONFESSED.
    (see court's Published OPINION pages 25 thru 29
    http://www.deb.uscourts.gov/sites/de...ysmnatfees.pdf )

    Whilst benefiting from those acts of perjury Paul Traub and Goldman Sachs Delaware law firm colluded and put forth a Forged "HAAS Affidavit" telling the court Laser HAAS waived millions of dollars in fees (probably talking about my turning down and reporting their bribe offer)

    Though the court ruled the lawyers had an "actual" conflict if interest that did "harm" the eToys estate about Goldman Sachs issues - that same court allowed the forgery to stay in the record and ruled this whistleblower must have the court"s permission to inform it about the fraud.

    HAAS must have the court's permission to inform the court that the HAAS Affidavit is a forgery. (As if someone really needs to prove they didnt give away millions of dollars in fees earned over a year - to parties admitting dozens of erroneous affidavits).

    By the LAW the Dept of Justice and the chief justice were required to Disqualify all the bad faith parties.(In re Middleton Arms).

    Including eToys CEO who testified, under penalty of perjury, that he was "extensive" arm's length from Creditors counsel Paul Traub (when they were actually partners {see Published OPINION linked above}).

    THEN the corrupt eToys Debtor counsel (secretly also Goldman Sachs counsel) nominated the corrupt eToys creditors counsel (Paul Traub) to be the one to prosecute Goldman Sachs - for a billion dollar stock fraud "spinning" scheme.

    In essence, Goldman Sachs sued Goldman Sachs -thousands lost a billion.

    None of this was prosecuted because of Department of Justice Conflict of Interests by "switching sides" (revolving door) where a Bain Cap., / Goldman Sachs law firm partner, was arranged ro become the very United States Attorney over these cases. (and to this very day ..they are trying to cover this up)

    http://crooksandliars.com/2015/01/mi...eering-lawsuit

    https://www.justice.gov/archive/olp/...ollyresume.htm

    Sullivan & Cromwell is the firm representing Sachs in the case NY Supreme Court of eToys (ebc1) v. Goldman Sachs

    That Paul Traub settled for a measly $7.5 million in 2013; and the crooked lawyers argued over who gets what of the $7.5. Then they closed eToys case in 201t (which, even without the US Attorney corruption, gives me 5 years Statute of limitations ..to 2020).

    To imply SullCrom was unaware its sister Delaware law firm was caught for playing fraud games, is a testimony disingenuous and of gross incompetence of the highest order.

    Especially given the fact it was aSullCrom partner who pointed out eToys (Gsachs) law firm asked for (and received) permission to Destroy eToys Books & Records (early in the case).

    Then that SullCrom attorney was removed from the case and I've cried foul to SullCrom a dozen times (and sued Sachs for RICO).



    NOW....a man (Jay Clayton) who is partners of SullCrom, who also works for Goldman Sachs (and wife is an executive of Sachs) who also invested in Bain Capital is nominated to be in charge of Goldman Sachs/ Bain Capital inquiries.

    In other words Nitti is to be put in charge of Capone cases.

    When people bark ...block..and deride about me, just because their guy is in office, they can't possibly be remarking about my character or the validity of the facts (which are all public docket records)

    Fighting against me (defending "them") is a testimony about the character of the those attacking me (obtuse to mayhem & murders).

    It's absurd that people argue for crooks to remain "Scot Free", simply because the crooks are in their neighborhood.

    this isnt ethical rocket science

    And the arguments that "my guys" can do corruption and fraud ...is...reprehensible/ABSURD!


    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	MittRomney_Secrets_Lies_2001_BainCapital_Demise.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	189.2 KB 
ID:	6725  

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Travel from OK, to DE, NY, CA
    Posts
    1,516

    Re: Reasons why Jay Clayton for SEC is bad; and a Delaware law firm is doomed to clos

    If the tyranny, cronyism, corruption and cover ups, upon the most highest places, is overcome, and our eToys case gets the justice - long overdue - then

    Romney will have to give back hundreds of millions of dollars in unjust enrichments.

    The MNAT law firm will close.

    Colm Connolly will be disbarred

    Many of MNAT will be disbarred

    Paul Traub will go to jail (and be disbarred)

    As will Frederick Rosner and dozens of others

    Goldman Sachs will get a billion dollar fine, and will lose its rights to do IPO's.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Travel from OK, to DE, NY, CA
    Posts
    1,516

    Re: Reasons why Jay Clayton for SEC is bad; and a Delaware law firm is doomed to clos

    MNAT, Paul Traub, Colm Connolly, US Trustee attorney Mark Kenney, and Frederick Rosner, plus Xroads LLC -

    All have betrayed their oaths of office, oaths to the BAR, and their appointed clients trust.

    Failure of courts and federal authorities to address this sine qua non issue - shows we are in a national crisis.

    There's no greater manifest injustice, than the betrayal of oaths & clients/public's trust!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Travel from OK, to DE, NY, CA
    Posts
    1,516

    Re: Reasons why Jay Clayton for SEC is bad; and a Delaware law firm is doomed to clos

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Jay_Clayton_Chart_of_items_UNFIT_for_SEC.jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	18.8 KB 
ID:	6726  

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Travel from OK, to DE, NY, CA
    Posts
    1,516

    Re: Reasons why Jay Clayton for SEC is bad; and a Delaware law firm is doomed to clos

    Link to the PDF, containing the Jay Clayton details (and pictures) above


    http://petters-fraud.com/JAY_Clayton...it_for_SEC.pdf

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •