Mitt Romney Chronicles

[laserhaas]

Hey genius - I did not make the video

Nor did I creat the title

I simply quoted

[laserhaas]

But, here is 1 that I did make

http://www.youtube.com/embed/DsbKcGKl-t4

[laserhaas]

[laserhaas]

Boo;Yah - Romney's bull [c]hit gets slapped down again.

This time by Talking Points Memo with SEC documentation

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archive...in_in_1999.php

[max1]

This is just another bullshit peice and the "Evidence" doesn't even have a date on it.

all you do is spew lies

here is a factual link (not opinion) on the subject.

and heres a good quote.

"The film claims Romney was involved in the acquisition, management and demise of the now-defunct KB Toys. He wasn’t. Bain bought the toy company nearly two years after Romney left Bain."

I'm sure you wont read it and thats ok, but everything you do and say makes it clear that your mental capacity more then likely had some bearing on where the money went you claim to have lost.

[laserhaas]

It is patently obvious that you only seek to destroy the message and messenger.

As usual, your banter & babble have no substance or cognitive value with any verity - what so ever!

For the persons you apparently are accusing of lying are
The SEC
Mitt Romney
Bain Capital

Which stated here
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/da...01009-0001.txt

THAT -

Bain Capital, Inc.,

President of Bain Investors VI and thus is the controlling person of Bain Investors VI. The executive officers of Bain Investors VI are set forth on Schedule A hereto. Bain Capital, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Bain Capital"), is the sole
------------
managing partner of the BCIP entities. Mr. W. Mitt Romney is the sole shareholder, sole director, Chief Executive Officer and President of Bain Capital and thus is the controlling person of Bain Capital. The executive
officers of Bain Capital are set forth on Schedule B hereto

[max1]

It is patently obvious that you only seek to destroy the message and messenger.

As usual, your banter & babble have no substance or cognitive value with any verity - what so ever!

For the persons you apparently are accusing of lying are
The SEC
Mitt Romney
Bain Capital

Which stated here
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/da...01009-0001.txt

THAT -

Bain Capital, Inc.,

President of Bain Investors VI and thus is the controlling person of Bain Investors VI. The executive officers of Bain Investors VI are set forth on Schedule A hereto. Bain Capital, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Bain Capital"), is the sole
------------
managing partner of the BCIP entities. Mr. W. Mitt Romney is the sole shareholder, sole director, Chief Executive Officer and President of Bain Capital and thus is the controlling person of Bain Capital. The executive
officers of Bain Capital are set forth on Schedule B hereto

Im not trying to destroy anything, I just want you to tell the truth about the years he was at bain. Your whole argument revolves around that single fact and you have it wrong.

[laserhaas]

When you effort at being somewhat humble - you throw me off somewhat. However, the fact of the matter remains - you are speaking from emotion. If you took the time to look at the SEC link in my previous comment - you would see that you are making an INVALID contention.

Mitt Romney & Bain Capital themselves said - in 2001 - that he was the SOLE owner and CEO of Bain Capital Inc

Their words!

You just refuse to accept them as true - because you KNOW where that leads.

[laserhaas]

Additionally, here's Mitt Romney's own Blind Family Trust Attorney stating;

Malt, who was designated by the campaign to address Romney's time at Bain, said
Romney finally resigned and reduced his role at the company to that of a passive
investor in 2001 when it became clear that he was going to run for Massachusetts
governor after the Olympics. The campaign declined to comment further.

[laserhaas]

By the way - before you go on a rant and make false allegations (again)

Please take note - that quote is from a Washington Post article

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...102000992.html

Malt, who was designated by the campaign to address Romney's time at Bain, said
Romney finally resigned and reduced his role at the company to that of a passive
investor in 2001 when it became clear that he was going to run for Massachusetts
governor after the Olympics. The campaign declined to comment further.

[laserhaas]

However. when that article was written in 2007 - they had a SECRET that was NOT yet discovered.

Bain Capital's law firm in Delaware (Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnel) - MNAT
had made one of their own partners into the United States Attorney in Delaware.

http://www.justice.gov/archive/olp/c...ollyresume.htm

[laserhaas]

You can have Mitt Romney run for President
the moment he stops trying to hide Bain Capital Frauds

He would look a whole let better in America's eyes
If he came clean and asked for a honorable - federal investigation!

[laserhaas]

By the way

My "whole" argument is not solely about Mitt Romney CEO of Bain Capital 2001.

The issue is they confessed to acts of Perjury and the judge let them keep the keys to the vault they were stealing from.

If someone came into your house and threw you out - then confessed to the Judge

and she said it is no big deal - they can keep the keys to your house.

How would you feel?

[max1]

Slow down big guy your gonna hurt yourself.

[laserhaas]

Another SEC document surfaces that Mitt Romney signed as sole owner and manager of Bain Capital in 2001.

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/da...-01-000745.txt

[Chase]

that does have a date, and does name romney, interesting.

[max1]

that does have a date, and does name romney, interesting.

I dont think it proves any thing more then someone can post documents on the internet. I just dont know what to trust anymore, and most of what has been posted in this thread is suspect at best, I'm not saying everything but I bet some of these posts are true but all the other things that are not overshadow it. Mitt aint my first pick, but I'm sure not going to let mis-imformation guide me in my choice.

[Chase]

well that is posted on the actual SEC website, that kind of validates it for me, that is an official website, not a blog or a forum...

i agree with what you are saying though Max

[max1]

After reading it your right it does have a date but all it is a document showing ownership of a bunch of worthless stock. Factcheck says Romney left Bain in 1999 to manage the winter Olympics.

http://factcheck.org/2012/07/factche...nt-is-all-wet/

I side with fact check, and I think someone is interpreting this document wrong....maybe its me.

[Jessica]

The Bain issue is pretty simple.

Romney owned Bain even after he stepped down from running the day to day relations of the company and overseeing it in an active role. He was the owner while he was running the Olympics. When he left Bain, Romney said that he would remain at least a partial owner while he left the running of the company to the executive committee. That's in the Fact Check article, and they have provided a source if you care to check.

Fact Check also goes on to explain that Romney initially felt that he would, in his capacity as part-time owner, continue to have a say in investment and personnel issues, but that organizing the Games took so much time that he had to pretty much abandon any involvement with Bain by 2000. In 2001, he formally changed his role to that of a passive investor.

If you choose not to support Romney because you think that his association with Bain in any capacity is a deal-breaker that's okay. But, if your only reason in doing so is because you'd like to believe that maybe between 1999 and 2001 Romney still pulled some strings with Bain or still was able to take part in or influence some of the decisions they made, that's on you (this being the universal "you", not anyone in particular), because there is no solid evidence that this occurred.

And, this is coming from an Obama supporter, a self-proclaimed leftist liberal who is tired of misinformation and people rabidly supporting whatever claim their side happens to make - whether it's accurate or not.