Re: Connecting the dots with regard to mossad involvement on 9-11
Relative to the math involved with the WTC building collapses, the laws of physics raised a stench of suspicion that would have given the odor from a massive raw-sewage backup the pleasant fragrance of a well-maintained rose garden in full magnificent bloom.
Originally Posted by GoodAmerican
The disconnect between what the 9/11 Commission CLAIMED happened and what the laws of physics irrefutably prove (EVERY TIME) could NOT have happened, is NOT a minor gap; it’s a major, unfathomable scientific CHASM. And, as you know, it does not take graduate or undergraduate level physics to figure it out. Any, high school physics “C” student is quite capable of doing the math.
To deny this is to wrap oneself inside of an increasingly preferred cocoon of CONCEPTUAL SCIENCE—well received within the United State over the past 30-35-years. Such science most often depends ENTIRELY on one’s ability to create mountains of pre-research CONCLUSIONS that preemptively dismiss ALL factual contradictions to those conclusions. Essentially, it boils down to the clueless squinting their eyes tightly shut and bellowing, “IS NOT!”
Politicians have fallen in love with the concept. It makes it so darn easy for them to tell the idiot components of their respective parties what they want to hear. And, simultaneously, it makes it all-the-easier for the IDIOTS to inhale pure crap simply because they’re so pre-disposed to believe it.
So, on these points we agree. But, then you brought up…
"The fact of the matter is:
Its public knowledge that All those people were in positions that gave them means, motive and opportunity to be involved in the planning, implementation, and cover-up of that false flag attack and murder of americans, drawing us into exactly what the neo-conmen wanted, a 100 year war with israels enemies...no amount of poo-pooing or calling me a hater or whatever can un-do that fact."
Having means, motive, and opportunity to break the law is NOT going to get the police an arrest warrant unless they can tie some group or specific persons DIRECTLY, in some way, to their using such means, motive, and opportunity in the commission of the crime in question. Circumstantial evidence alone won’t do it and 3rd-year students in any 4th-tier law school are most capable of making mockeries of those who attempt it. Otherwise, highly capable major legitimate legal elements in this nation would be standing in line to prove it and topple the perpetrators.
So, like it or not, your charges amount to opinion-based speculation. And, the fact that YOU believe it—I’m sure there is no shortage of others who believe it as well—does not make it so, only that it’s a POSSIBILITY. And, relative to this type of speculation, when you write, “…i fucking hate people who cant think for themselves,” you’re problem is more likely with people who don’t think WHAT you think, not with those who can’t think for themselves.
But, again, like it or not, until YOU, or someone else, comes up with some DIRECT evidence, YOU’RE simply waging a hurtful, not to mention unwinnable, war on this forum; and you’re the one with the problem.
And, while I agree with the statement, "The American People will not know what really happened on 9-11 without a NEW truly independant investigation," it’s NOT going to happen during the remainder of my lifetime and, most probably not during yours, either.
In fact, if it EVER happens, it will be sufficiently long enough from now that it’ll amount to nothing more than a footnote in the history books. And the generation of Americans reading it—if we’re still around and a sovereign nation—will view it with the same degree of incredulousness that MY generation experienced after reading the ENTIRE account of the DRED SCOTT Decision and how partisan political party narcissism on the part of a U. S. President resulted in a temporary U. S. Supreme Court ruling that slavery was an absolute RIGHT.
Drinking under a different name is not the same thing as joining Alcoholics Anonymous.