What was the reason behind Senator Biden's refusal to sign the Slip (required for Senate to process a Judicial nomination) - of Colm Connolly?
Was it merely a Democrat saying no to a Republican request or
can it be that Senator Biden - having received an email from me on how these guys are peeing in his back yard - apparently without his permission. For most assuredly - they would not put DE's Corp Dominance at risk for the sake of www.MNAT.com , Paul Traub and the client Bain & Goldman Sachs (both Republican tilted organizations).
Of the many items not told to Reuters (in email below) includes Colm Connolly's failure to be confirmed due to Biden's refusal, the lightning fast promotion of DE Dist Ct Justice (KAJ) to the 3rd Cir after he threatened Paul Traub and MNAT with action and the NY Supreme Court promotion of Justice Moskowitz (who was also going after Traub).
It is anyone's guess as to the real reason why - but all of them are dubious none the less.
Email to Reuters
This past week your entity (Reuters) did a story on the failings of the SEC in the Madoff saga
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE59T4W720091031?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandCha nnel=11604
Previously, during your transistion from the Globe - we reached out to you concerning a similar story of national importance.
In 2005, after confessing to felony violations abundant a law firm received a slap on the wrist and the promise of future willful blindness by the Dept of Justice. The SEC was also requested to Back Off from initiating an official investigation - even after the SEC had promised us they would initiate such.
We received email threats as well - by our own attorney of record - as a forward warning by TBF to Back Off from any further investigations or we would lose our Court approved fees, have our career assaulted and other retaliations. The felt so protected the threat was actually emailed to us by our own attorney (Heiman). This is a matter of public court docket record.
Arguably this story is as sexy as the Madoff case, if not more so. An attorney and his firm confessed to 17 false affidavits - as officers of the Court - deliberately deceiving the court. Doing so after being instructed by the DE Dept of Justice against the very felony violation they furtively schemed to accomplished (please see Motion to Disgorge TBF for $1.6 million - specifically parts 19 & 35 (here))
Less than 10 days later on Feb 24, 2005 - TBF received a Stipulation to Settle that made the Disgorge Motion moot, whilst giving Paul Traub the promise of DOJ willful blindness (see WHEREAS clauses (here)).
The sexy meat is current news exceptional - for Traub - being granted the illicit DOJ get out of jail free card then became associated with Adelphia (Rigas's went to jail for more than a decade). Traub's other client is OKUN's 1031 TaxGroup - where Okun was sentenced to 100 years in prison.
Traub also became the partner of Marc Dreier and Petters Group Worldwide founder.
Marc Dreier is doing 20 years for $700 million in fraud (speciously in a MN prison)
Tom Petters is now on trial for $3 Billion in Fraud.
How mitigated would the severity of those fraud issues - might have been greatly reduced - had the feds not given Paul Traub's firm the illegitimate implied ,blanket, immunity?
The case also has relevance on many planes - as the eToys v Goldman Sachs case in NY Sup Ct (601805/2002) - is being handled by Paul Traub and his planted CEO (Barry Gold). Where the www.MNAT.com law firm nominated Paul Traub's firm to handle the NY Sup Ct case.
Problematic are the following issues - eToys is suing Goldman Sachs because the IPO went for $78 per share and eToys only received $16.50. The MNAT law firm - as Debtor counsel for eToys failed to inform the DE Federal Court that it was Goldman Sachs attorney of record in DE when it petitioned for - and Received an approved Order - to Destroy Books n Records (see Order (here)) - this issue of Collusion is compounded by the Fact that Traub submitted a false Supplemental Affidavit to gain the DE Federal Court's permission to handle the NY Supreme Court case.
Not finally (as there are many DOJ resignations, promotions and overt acts of Obstruction and Judicial maneuver promotions- that make the Senator Stevens case look childish) - there remains the issue of the NY Supreme Ct case trial that is soon to begin;
Traub, Barry Gold and MNAT know we caught them previously by faux pas of docket records and the DE DOJ lapse linquae that provided us the smoking gun leading to the WSJ July 25, 2005 story on Traub's conflict/non-disclosure sanctions.
So - apparently protecting the NY Sup Ct case from supplying us with similar evidence nearly 1/2 the docket is Under SEAL!
All that it takes for evil to thrive - is good men do nothing.
Please do not remain idle - for America needs your effort to expose this corruption.
When we reported this to the DOJ Public Corruption Unit in central CA - that US Attorney shut down the Public Corruption Unit, purportedly threatening career Asst US Attorneys to keep their mouths shut and told the press the manuever was to make the DOJ more efficient (see L A Times story by reporter Scott Glover - "Shake-up roils federal prosecutors" (here)) -
There is also a US Attorney who refused to investigate and prosecute the matter (without telling anyone he was a former partner with MNAT). A Presidential hopeful benefited from the crimes and Harold Bonacquist of Traub Bonacquist & Fox is listed by the NY Supreme Court as to be contacted through the US Embassy/Consulate General in the Philippines to make an appointment with him in Istanbul (a non-extradict country).
You can make a difference -- by choosing Not to toss aside one of the largest stories ever to be told!
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by BillW
