Welcome!
Go Back   Talk Delaware Online > All things news > Life & Entertainment News

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Rumors about Jackson, Beatles catalog untrue, McCartney says 
  #1  
Old 07-09-2009, 12:19 PM
Naomi's Avatar
Site Supporter

 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Newark
Posts: 5,942
Thanks: 7,755
Thanked 4,339 Times in 2,333 Posts
Naomi has a reputation beyond repute
Naomi has a reputation beyond reputeNaomi has a reputation beyond reputeNaomi has a reputation beyond reputeNaomi has a reputation beyond reputeNaomi has a reputation beyond reputeNaomi has a reputation beyond reputeNaomi has a reputation beyond repute
(CNN) -- First the rumor went around that Michael Jackson was leaving the Beatles catalog to Paul McCartney in his will. Then the rumor was that McCartney was upset that Jackson didn't leave the Beatles catalog to the Beatle in his will.






Neither is true, said McCartney in a posting on his Web site.
"Some time ago, the media came up with the idea that Michael Jackson was going to leave his share in the Beatles songs to me in his will which was completely made up and something I didn't believe for a second," McCartney said.
"Now the report is that I am devastated to find that he didn't leave the songs to me. This is completely untrue," he added.
The story of the Beatles song catalog is long and tangled. At the time McCartney and writing partner John Lennon wrote their songs, they retained only a portion of the rights in the publishing company created by the Beatles' manager, Brian Epstein, and London music publisher Dick James. (The company was called Northern Songs, a nod to the Beatles' Liverpudlian roots.) The company went public in 1965.
According to the myth-busting site Snopes.com, Lennon and McCartney each had 15 percent of the shares, Epstein (and his NEMS Enterprises) had 7.5 percent, James and partner Charles Silver had 37.5 percent and Beatles George Harrison and Ringo Starr had less than 2 percent. The rest was available for public investment.
Over the years (and partly due to the group's legal battles) the Beatles lost or sold their control, and the catalog of about 250 songs -- almost all of Lennon/McCartney's creations -- ended up in the hands of British media mogul Sir Lew Grade and his ATV Music Publishing. ATV added the Beatles' songs to its holdings, a cache that eventually grew to more than 4,000 songs. (Other songs in the catalog include those recorded by the Kinks, the Moody Blues and Elvis Presley.)

In 1984, the catalog was put up for sale again. McCartney wanted to buy his creations back, but for various reasons wasn't a front-runner. Jackson -- who had taken to investing in music publishing at, ironically, McCartney's recommendation -- came up with the winning bid of $47.5 million. The sale went through in 1985.
In 1995, Sony paid Jackson $95 million to merge the catalog with its Sony Music. Jackson maintained 50 percent control. In 2005, Sony/ATV Music had more than 200,000 songs in its catalog, a CNN.com article reported.
To finance his lifestyle, Jackson borrowed money, using the catalog as collateral. Nevertheless, he never lost the asset. The entire catalog was estimated to be worth between $600 million and $1 billion in 2005, according to a 2005 article in USA Today.
As a songwriter, McCartney has continued to receive some royalties from his work, as has Lennon's estate.
McCartney said in the posting that he and Jackson may have "drifted apart," but "we never really fell out."
"At times like this, the press do tend to make things up, so occasionally, I feel the need to put the record straight," he wrote.
McCartney and Jackson recorded a pair of duets in the early 1980s, "The Girl Is Mine" and "Say Say Say." The latter hit No. 1 in late 1983.

I never knew the real story behind this
Reply With Quote
Re: Rumors about Jackson, Beatles catalog untrue, McCartney says 
  #2  
Old 07-09-2009, 12:26 PM
Tracy's Avatar
The Queen

 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Castle of Hearts
Posts: 9,170
Thanks: 10,011
Thanked 6,960 Times in 4,024 Posts
Tracy has a reputation beyond reputeTracy has a reputation beyond reputeTracy has a reputation beyond reputeTracy has a reputation beyond reputeTracy has a reputation beyond reputeTracy has a reputation beyond reputeTracy has a reputation beyond repute
Tracy has a reputation beyond reputeTracy has a reputation beyond reputeTracy has a reputation beyond reputeTracy has a reputation beyond repute
That would be so nice.....but probably not feasable. All those reports of him being in so much debt. The main concern of the estate at this point has to be his children.
__________________


<3 I love a warm pig belly for my aching feet <3
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
beatles, catalog, jackson, mccartney, rumors, untrue

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are EST. The time now is 03:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
TalkDelaware.comAd Management plugin by RedTyger