Reports: Michael Jackson's Kids Not Biologically His

Rusty · #1 07-01-2009, 06:07 AM

Jen McDonnell, dose.ca
Published: Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Good news for Katherine Jackson: Michael Jackson's mother, who has been awarded temporary custody of his children, may not have to face a custody battle against his ex-wife Debbie Rowe, because the kids are reportedly not hers.

Bad news for Katherine Jackson: the kids are reportedly not his, either.
On Tuesday, multiple sources told TMZ.com that Jackson is not the biological father of any of his three children, nor are the two kids he had with Rowe biologically hers.

According to TMZ's report, Jackson's two oldest children -- Michael Jr. and Paris - were conceived through in vitro. Jackson was reportedly not the sperm donor and Rowe's eggs were not used, though she did carry the children.

Meanwhile, Us Weekly's new cover story claims Michael Jr. and Paris's biological father is Jackson's dermatologist and Rowe's former boss, Arnold Klein.

"He is the dad," a source told the mag. "He and Debbie signed an agreement saying they would never reveal the truth."

Jackson's youngest child, Prince Michael II, was delivered by another surrogate, reports TMZ.

-----------------------------------------------

Seriously, I believed that MJ and Rowe never consummated their union. That wasn't a big surprise. I thought that they did things in vitro but I thought that it was Rowe's eggs and MJ's sperm at least. Interesting that the speculation surrounds the dermatologist and that the eggs weren't even Rowe's. That would explain her lack of maternal feelings but who donated the eggs? I feel concerned for the victims in all of this - those kids. It all sounds like a science experiment to please a narcissist.

Any thoughts?

frogman68 · #2 07-01-2009, 06:29 AM

Depending on how much money is involved.

They are my eggs umm I mean sperm

I saw some guy from France saying the kids are his.

There will be alot of DNA tests to get to the bottom of this.
I feel bad for the Jackson's , Michael in appearance (not physical) was "great" now that he is dead look at the mess he has left behind

Naomi · #3 07-01-2009, 07:27 AM

Rusty
didn't we just have this conversation last night?

Delguy92 · #4 07-01-2009, 08:23 AM

I saw this type of thing coming a mile away. Maybe not this specifically, but as wierd as Michael Jackson was publically, I was sure that it was just the tip of the iceburg compared to his wierdness in his private life.

I am willing to bet that we will see a lot more very strange things revealed in the months to come.

paulusa302 · #5 07-01-2009, 08:47 AM

I say it don't matter. If they didn't try to be parents when Mike was alive than too bad for them now.

Them kinds only know one family. The Jackson family and that is where they belong.

Kid Lester · #6 07-01-2009, 02:43 PM

Personally, I find it pretty damn creepy that a twice alleged pedophile went out of his way to create kids he could have that are in no way related to him.

No accusation. Just sayin'.

Just sayin'.

paulusa302 · #7 07-01-2009, 02:46 PM

He is dead and gone. Talking about what was, is like talking about a how long a traffic light was that they are talking down from the pole.

Kid Lester · #8 07-01-2009, 02:48 PM

Well, that's what this thread is about. Thoughts on this 'news'.

And again, I'm not making an accusation. I'm saying the man did weird things that make me scratch my head.

paulusa302 · #9 07-01-2009, 02:50 PM

Don't get me wrong, I am enjoying this topic. I just want to offer my thoughts without bringing the conversation to a halt.

I just want to offer words of wisdom after that beat down I got from the Amber Alert post I made

zapata2119 · #10 07-01-2009, 03:19 PM

surprise surprise.......

Delguy92 · #11 07-01-2009, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kid Lester

Personally, I find it pretty damn creepy that a twice alleged pedophile went out of his way to create kids he could have that are in no way related to him.

No accusation. Just sayin'.

Just sayin'.

I agree with that. It's like he wanted kids of his own who weren't actually related to him... hmm....
Let's say MJ was gay, well I can understand that he wouldn't want to create a child the usual way of m/f sex.

But if you are going to take the In Vitro fertilization route, then why wouldn't you use your own DNA...?

And if he had trouble with his 'swimmers' and had more money than god, wouldn't you go to a sperm bank to have it professionally and confidentially done and not ask your freakin dermatoligist to do it...?

Of course he's not gay because he married 2 women and kissed Lisa Marie on stage.
And we still don't know the bioligical mother of 1 of his kids.

It's like he wanted the whole thing to be as strange and as complicated as possible.

Panama Girl · #12 07-01-2009, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Delguy92

It's like he wanted the whole thing to be as strange and as complicated as possible.

Well, we are talking about Michael Jackson, you know...

mastiffmom · #13 07-02-2009, 06:07 AM

And just think, if Momma Jackson can't be guardian for the kids - they get Diana Ross!!! Why don't we just get Liz Taylor and Bubbles the Chimp to be the parents!!