Hillary Clinton to be Obama's Secretary of State?

Tracy · #1 11-14-2008, 06:34 AM

It's no secret that I would have preferred Obama to have picked Hillary as his VP, but IMHO, this would still be a very smart move!

Political Punch

Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior National Correspondent Jake Tapper

Jake Tapper is ABC News' Senior National Correspondent based in the network's Washington bureau. He writes about politics and popular culture and covers a range of national stories.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton?

November 13, 2008 10:36 PM
There's a lot of buzz in DC tonight about the fact that the Obama Transition Team is, according to one knowledgeable source, "very serious" about Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, being under consideration for Secretary of State.

George Stephanopoulos reported Clinton's name being in the mix last week on Good Morning America, but the buzz grew louder today after Clinton was spotted boarding a flight to Chicago.

Her spokesman Philippe Reines would not discuss Clinton's schedule, and of course the Obama Transition Team would not comment.

The thinking about a Secretary of State Clinton is simple, I'm told: she's smart, she's strong, she's experienced, she's a team player, she is usually pretty diplomatic, and she also brings some gender diversity to an Obama Team concerned about such matters.

She brings instant stature to the job, one Democrat told me. Many world leaders have known her for almost two decades.

"Clinton is the gold standard around the world, " said Chris Lehane, a former spokesman for Vice President Al Gore.

There are drawbacks, of course. Her husband Bill Clinton's vast and varied international business dealings and relationships, which have put him at odds with her policy positions.

And of course, she and Obama famously and repeatedly clashed over international issues during their contentious primaries. She assailed as "naive" his willingness to speak to the leaders of hostile regimes without preconditions and she assailed as reckless his public discussions about his willingness to attack high-value terrorist targets in Pakistan with or without Pakistan government permission.

Obama "basically threatened to bomb Pakistan, which I don't think was a particularly wise position to take," Clinton said at the Democratic debate in Cleveland, Ohio, on February 26.

Most ugly, probably was the Tuzla sniper fire incident. Clinton erroneously claimed about a trip to Tuzla, Bosnia: "I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base."

That was later proven false, and Clinton acknowledged "misspeaking."
Countered the Obama campaign's Tommy Vietor: "Senator Clinton said that a planned welcoming ceremony was cancelled because they needed to avoid sniper fire, but news footage shows that she was met by a small child who read her a poem. Contrary to the latest spin from the Clinton campaign, when you make a false claim that's in your prepared remarks, it's not misspeaking, it's misleading, and it's part of a troubling pattern of Senator Clinton inflating her foreign policy experience."

Ouch. Harsh words for one's Secretary of State.

But no doubt that's water under the bridge. In Boca Raton in May, Obama -- asked by a vote if he would consider putting Clinton on the ticket -- said, "I'm a practical-minded guy. And, you know, one of my heroes is Abraham Lincoln. And a while back there was a wonderful book written by Doris Kearns Goodwin called 'Team of Rivals.'"

The book, Obama said, discussed how "Lincoln basically pulled in all the people who had been running against him into his Cabinet because whatever personal feelings there were, the issue was how can we get this country through this time of crisis. And I think that has to be the approach that one takes, whether it's vice president or Cabinet, whoever."

-- Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller

Political Punch

BillW · #2 11-14-2008, 08:30 AM

Couldn't care less.

Delly · #3 11-14-2008, 08:48 AM

Whatever.

M.Opaliski · #4 11-14-2008, 08:50 AM

What makes it a smart move, I mean aside from being the First Lady she has no Foreign Relations experience which is what the State Department handles. I would think that in order to be most effective at working toward the things that she talked about during her campaign she would be better served to stay in the Senate, unless of course that was all just political rhetoric, you know ...

Bada Bing · #5 11-14-2008, 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by M.Opaliski

What makes it a smart move, I mean aside from being the First Lady she has no Foreign Relations experience which is what the State Department handles. I would think that in order to be most effective at working toward the things that she talked about during her campaign she would be better served to stay in the Senate, unless of course that was all just political rhetoric, you know ...

MO, can you limit your answers to between one and three words? Makes
for quicker reading.

M.Opaliski · #6 11-14-2008, 09:12 AM

One

Sure thing Bing (wow that rhymes), always glad to help out where I can.

Three

Delly · #7 11-14-2008, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by M.Opaliski

One

Sure thing Bing (wow that rhymes), always glad to help out where I can.

Three

Way'da Go, MO

Raptor · #8 11-14-2008, 03:16 PM

Hillary as SoS? What a great move! Then maybe she really can dodge sniper-fire on the airport tarmac of some "unfriendly" nation.

__________________
When in doubt, EMPTY the magazine.

Jessica · #9 11-14-2008, 04:08 PM

Seriously. If you don't care about the thread topic, don't post a reply. There isn't any reason to reply to a thread with a short snippy answer about how little you care. It's curt and comes off as rude to the person who spent the time to create the post.

Know what shows you don't give a ding dong? Not replying!

__________________
No one can make you feel inferior without your consent.
--Eleanor Roosevelt

Green Lantern · #10 11-14-2008, 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jessica

Seriously. If you don't care about the thread topic, don't post a reply. There isn't any reason to reply to a thread with a short snippy answer about how little you care. It's curt and comes off as ruse to the person who spent the time to create the post.

Know what shows you don't give a ding dong? Not replying!

If you have an issue with a post, thread or member, bring it to the staff via PM.

Please don't try to police posts, threads or members on your own.